Reply #65: Can you take it one step further?

[hack89]

and demonstrate an understanding of what is actually required to make all that happen? If it is such a proven fact why is it that no one in the CT "researcher" community is willing to go out on a limb and offer something more than a superficial analysis of what happened. Where is that analysis that says : "in order for the building to fall as observed, x charges were place on beams x, y and z and detonated in this sequence."? Demolition is a science - calculating and publishing what is required would be easy. Yet no one has even attempted anything beyond superficial analysis of internet pictures and video. Could it be that there are no real engineers in the "researcher" community?

I got a particular chuckle over the scientific analysis - show me a single engineering organization that has challenged the FEMA and NIST reports.