Reply #19: great compilation of info and resources...

[delver]

Mike Ruppert first mentions Delta 1989 in his final chapter, "Summation: Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury." Ruppert notes that this chapter includes some speculation along with additional pieces of evidence. The Clevelend/Flight 1989 story is extremely compelling and this was the first I ever heard of it.

Yet, I think it is telling that Ruppert does not include this story in his main case. The fact is that there are much stronger, more glaring omissions and lies to the 9/11 story. Such as: Why does the Commission not mention anything about WTC 7 collapsing or about Sibel Edmonds testimony or about the ISI?? I am new to this board but not to 9/11 skepticism...I think it is important to keep our minds focused and not to get too carried away with endless details. True understanding this issue does not come from encyclopedic knowledge of the details, but from realizing and doing what must be done, once you see through the illusion.


Take a look at the new Rigorous Intuition for a clear-headed take on approaching the 9/11 issue:

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/05/let-me-put-it-this-way.html