You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #120: Wrong. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
seatnineb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #112
120. Wrong.
On the contrary.........

I'll believe what you say.

A plane crashed into the pentagon.

What I am asking is ...........did it contain DU as a counterweight.

If it did........

Which year was that plane built?

Let me give you a little hint as to when boeing phased out the use of DU in the construction of their planes.......

DU has also been used in aircraft to make counterweights in the tailplane. A Boeing spokesman told BBC News Online: "The company began using DU in the early 1960s.

Boeing replaced it with tungsten in the early 1980s, on grounds of cost and availability. "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/sci/tech/568234.stm

And now I will ask you the question for the second time.

When was the plane that is said to have crashed into the Pentagon built......

Here is the n-number......and it's serial number.......

N644AA Serial 24602

Now go surf ,Maggy........

And when you get back ,you can tell all and sundry which year the plane that crashed into the Pentagon was built.

As for making claims that Dr Rokke is talking crap...........

I don't want to be harsh on you Maggy.......

But you should show more respect:

On Sept. 11, I called a medical doctor who lives 7 miles from the Pentagon and warned her
that DU could have burned in the hijacked jets that crashed (up to 3000 pounds were used in 747's). She turned on her gamma meter - radiation levels were 8 times higher than normal inside her house. She informed the Nuclear Information ResourceService in Washington DC, and the EPA, FBI, HazMat and other emergency response gencies went to the Pentagon to investigate.
A pile of rubble from the crash was radioactive, but the EPA rep said "oh... it's probably depleted uranium... it's not a health hazard unless you breathe it". Firefighters, Pentagon personel, and communities nearby DID BREATHE IT. There was no followup investigation, and what about the World Trade Center in NY? Radiation almost never gets into the media. It is a taboo subject.

of http://www.xs4all.nl/~stgvisie/VISIE/radioactive-NewYork.html


As I said.......I'll take Dr Rokke and his colleagues over you .......anytime.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC