Reply #16: what I've read here and through all of the provided links today, is

[meppie-meppie not]

all new to me. I've seen brief mentions of a flight 1989 and "X" but not understood where they fit in to the scheme of things. In "Crossing the Rubicon" the author talks about Promis soft wear and all it portends, one of those things being the remote flying of a passenger plane. Shortly after finishing the book I ran across some articles on the net questioning the veracity of flight 77, i.e., it was not AA 77 that went into the pentagon. I then bought "In Plane Sight" and in it they question if any of the passenger planes, we think we saw, were in fact the planes that crashed that day. I've always thought this a bogus premise because where are those passengers? where are those planes? Today is the first time those question have been intelligently addressed for me and now I'm starting to understand where people are coming from and going with their questions. The Omission Repost deliberately failed to address so many things including the near hijacking that day of UA 23. Where are and who were those intended hijackers of UA 23? How come they have never been reported about as the other 19 and the lone 20th have been? How come they haven't been "hunted down and brought to justice"? I am still in a quandary as to the whereabouts of all those passengers from the downed planes of 9/11. If they were shuttled onto another flight what became of them after that? I appreciate all the work you people are doing with respect to 9/11, Thank you all :-)