You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ASBESTOS: the REAL Reason behind 9/11? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
spooked Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 09:49 PM
Original message
ASBESTOS: the REAL Reason behind 9/11?
Advertisements [?]
I posted this theory in another forum, but I was thinking that I'd like to get the opinion of this board.

My Theory: (tell me if anyone else has come out with this)

I believe that the World Trade Towers HAD TO COME DOWN because they were a HUGE ASBESTOS liability.

Using the World Trade Towers in a terrorist attack was so convenient for Cheney and the Pentagon as well as Larry Silverman who gets BILLIONS in Insurance money rather trhan having to pay out ASBESTOS claims!

For over a year I have been trying to find more information on ASBESTOS and the WTC. I just know there is a huge link there.

http://letsroll911.org/articles/controlleddemolition.ht...

"Six months before the attacks on the World Trade Center, the World Trade Center was "privatized" by being leased to a private sector developer. The lease was purchased by the Silverstein Group for $3.2 billion 6 weeks before 911. But the World Trade Towers were not the real estate prize the Silverstein Group might have been led to believe. The towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built. Other New York developers had been driven into bankruptcy by the costly mandated renovations, and $200 million represented an entire year's worth of revenues from the World Trade Towers.

The attacks on 9/11 changed the picture. Instead of renovation, Silverstein is rebuilding, funded by the insurance coverage on the property which 'fortuitously' covered acts of terrorism. Even better, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the two, in Silverstein's view, seperate attacks. The total potential payout is $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a fabulous new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein Group, including Larry Silverstein himself."


Those of you who have been researching 9/11, what do you think about this theory? Have you found any information that would support this idea?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC