You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Lawson may or may not be "disinfo" but there's no doubt about Shack. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Lawson may or may not be "disinfo" but there's no doubt about Shack.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 01:14 PM by JackRiddler
"Disinfo" meaning a witting agent. But who cares about Lawson? Seriously.

Like all bedunkers looking for the general smear against 9/11 skepticism, he's going after the easy, easy targets provided by the fools and shysters on the supposedly anti-OCT side.

I can tell you, no question, that if I were running this forum the no-plane nonsense would be promptly shut down.

No-planes in its origins is obvious disinfo and an insult to reason. I speak on it at length here because we can see how disinfo works. No-planes was the result of a two-year trial period among increasingly ridiculous phantom objects (the "pod," the "flash") until, finally, the most absurd possible nonsense was devised.

Hey, no plane at all! EVERYONE is a potential agent, or a fool of the highest order! What a great combination - I'm sure if the CIA didn't devise it, they wish they had. If you wanted to invent a device for bogus "inside job" claims calculated to alienate and disgust everyone at once - relatives, people who were in Lower Manhattan, media, any semi-rational thinking person - and assault the very IDEA of evidence in a kind of post-modern non-plus ultra, you could not do better. This is a kind of spearpoint in the attack that would disregard every real piece of evidence - for official foreknowledge, for facilitation and orchestration, for the alleged hijackers and the real nature of their "networks," for cover-up and obstruction, for propaganda preparation - in the name of pretending to investigate 9/11. Insult to injury.

I'm sure in the Propaganda World they have Oscars for this kind of achievement.

The tip-off that whoever was originally devising it (within the Haupt/Webfairy/Woods/Reynolds group) was not merely ill, but consciously seeking to achieve maximum disruption, is the vehemence with which said cell then subsequently accused EVERYONE who didn't immediately salute the nonsense as the True Solution of being a hired agent of the State.

"Nose out" is one of the worst examples. I'm very, very sorry for you if you are truthfully saying that when you see this low-res picture - in which debris flying out the other side happens to look semi-cylindrical from the angle it's shot - you seriously believe you are seeing a nose cone. Because if you do really believe it, that's not a symptom of the kind of mental illness that can be treated, but more just the kind of general cognitive impediment to which we tend to attach very uncharitable labels.

But I don't really believe that someone who can self-evidently write at a good 10th grade level and higher really believes this shit. Triple-ditto on Shack. Those of you who push the nose-cone poison pill must know what you are doing. Along with the right-wing opportunist fanatics like Alex Jones and We Are Dumbteabagfuckers, um, "Change," you are far more responsible for the irrelevance of this forum and of the former "movement" than any of the bedunkers. You are there to provide the ultimate in self-made strawmen for the beating. It's a shame I can't use the choicer language you deserve without getting this post deleted. Congratulations for your successful obfuscation and ruination of the former "movement." You can definitely go home now. Mission accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC