9/11, NIST, and Bush Science

[procopia]

(This essay is too long to post many relevant points and documentation. Please follow link)

"In 2005, NIST released the results of their three year investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11. I will show that the report uses deceptive and unscientific reasoning to reach untenable conclusions. To prove this, I will use NIST’s own statements and evidence to show their deceptive practices, and that their conclusions are unscientific and contradicted by all or most of the relevant facts.

"I propose the following definition:

"Bush science: an argument that employs the political method with almost no evidence to support it—a predetermined conclusion containing fabricated and practically non-existent evidence—or even contradictory evidence. It can be used to invent a new “scientific reality” where known laws of physics are inconvenient and therefore ignored. An outrageous theory—a theory contradicted by all or most of the relevant facts.

"Bush science possesses next to zero credibility. Indeed, it defies common sense. Bush science is so deceptive that it can only be considered a deliberate and intentional lie. It can consist of most or all of the following:

Predetermined Conclusion

Fabricated Evidence

Relevant Evidence Ignored

Contradictory Evidence Ignored

Laws of Physics Contradicted

Deceptive Experiments

Conclusions Contradicted by All or Most of the Evidence


"The NIST report consists of all of the above; therefore, it is Bush science. Consequently, it is not credible and should be rejected as a false explanation for why the WTC towers were completely destroyed. I will examine NIST’s own statements and “scientific” evidence to demonstrate this."

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/search?q=NIST+scientists#_edn3