You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #94: Why for Global Warming? Ozone Hole Protection Makes More Sense. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
SocraticTruths Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
94. Why for Global Warming? Ozone Hole Protection Makes More Sense.
I haven't seen much spraying the last month here in Bostonia. A similar stoppage seemed to take place around the time of the Moyer reports. Geonengineering proposals to combat global warming have been around for a while. You had the Teller plan. Benford wrote a big article on it.


Gregory Benford | November 1997
Climate Controls:
If we treated global warming as a technical problem instead of a moral outrage, we could cool the world.
http://www.reason.com/news/show/30433.html


Crutzen's plan is to geoengineer in the stratosphere. What we are seeing in beind done in the troposphere. There also is a net warming effect from the aviation emissions. It appears that "they" are trying to accelerate the global warming in search of a blank Frankensteinian check to play their atmospheric chemistry games.

I think that it makes more sense that the reason we see the spraying being done in the troposphere around the sun is to radiatively forcing the uv-b rays. I think spraying has been done at night because they thought it would be less obvious. Whenever they are too blatant, more and more people start asking questions and spreading the word. I also feel in my gut that they are trying to make the global warming worse.

Frankensteinian UV-B radiation aerosol mitigation makes the most sense to me for what we are witnessing. Here is some info from a "respectable" scientific source that backs this up. I think another sign that this is the reason for what we are currently seeing is that we never hear about this too much as a theory for the chemtrails. Finally, I wrote before that it is harmful to be out in the sun too much. The problem however is that we need the sun to get our vitamin D.

http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/ozone/rtm/uvsens.html
4. Boundary Layer Ozone Sensitivity
Ozone in the troposphere and particularly in the boundary layer play an important role in surface UV budgets. Brühl and Crutzen (1989) indicated the disproportionate role that tropospheric ozone plays in UV-B absorption; more scattering events in the lower atmosphere due to greater molecular and aerosol scattering effectively lengthen the ozone path length in the troposphere, thus making a given quantity of ozone in the troposphere more effective in attenuating UV-B than an equal amount of ozone in the stratosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC