Reply #5: Totally f*cked!

[JackRiddler]

So some quick research reveals Eric D. Miller is indeed a Holocaust denier, a moron, and one of the worst writers imaginable.

Check out the ludicrous malapropisms starting with the first sentence of his Auschwitz book:
http://www.lulu.com/browse/preview.php?fCID=585818

Yes, there is a push on by right-wingers and professional anti-Judaists to take over the 9/11 truth movement, and most of the activists are being total sheep, failing to question anyone who labels themselves a 9/11 truthseeker or inside-job believer.

This has a lot to do with my splits with many who now call themselves the 9/11 Truth movement. I'm very happy I haven't been involved in Arizona.

Here is a conference I co-organized, by comparison:

Free video: http://911busters.com/a911-Commission.html

DVD http://911truthstore.com/911truth/catalog/9-11-Citizens-CommissionAn-Open-Inquiry-into-the-Attacks-of-Se-p-11164.html

I'm even going to grant you that those are indeed a few of the current "biggest names" among 9/11 CTs, though I hear many of them are not actually going to Arizona. Insofar as they didn't figure out who Eric D. Williams was in advance of accepting a speaking opportunity, that's in my book almost as bad as knowing. People should be able to google whoever they're dealing with and not enter into such "compromises." At any rate, look for most of those speakers not to even show.

Then again, I have never been a "CT," as this term is thrown like a blanket over anyone who applies the tools of skepticism to the Official Conspiracy Theory. "9/11 CTs" are a phenomenon that today exists in symbiosis with 9/11 OCTs. Loose Change specifically exists to provoke a reaction as a means of getting attention, and ultimately gives rise to a Screw Loose Change. Both rise together, and steal the sun and air from logical examination of 9/11. (It kind of reminds me of Democrats v. Republicans.)

This is even more true of the full whack-jobs a la Judy Wood, who wouldn't be known at all if the semi-professional debunkers weren't around to act as her promotional wing (good work). (Sadly, this isn't true of Eric D. Williams and his conference. He managed to put his conference together, at least this far, and it's a serious problem for all who associated themselves with him.)

At any rate I notice we don't have a "Screw 9/11 Press for Truth." Now why is that?

Meanwhile, the biggest names in rigorous 9/11 skepticism are an entirely different set, and they have for the most part not tainted themselves by these associations: Paul Thompson, Nafeez Ahmed, Michel Chossudovsky, Mike Ruppert, Mike Berger (Improbable Collapse and 911Truth.org), Peter Dale Scott (who sadly looks to be in Phoenix, though I bet this is false advertising), Mike Kane, Mike Richardson... our own Kevin Fenton.

I'd like to see "Screw Loose Change" try to take this on:

http://Justicefor911.org