Reply #230: The 9/11 Commission based their UA 175 impact time of 9:03:11...

[quicknthedead]

on the NTSB Flight Study of Feb. 2002 (which inside this report said the aircraft impacted at approximately 09:02:40); i.e., the Commission dismissed the 9:02:40 and gave the determined time as 9:03:11, to the SECOND, based on ALL THE INFORMATION / EVERYTHING THEY HAD.

You boys have a problem when the data doesn't suit your purpose, so you find it to be "unreliable". You are intellectually dishonest.

Prove the data is unreliable, because your word by itself means nothing.
And that is no theory--that is a fact.

This isn't complicated, just logical, boys. If this were rocket science, a lot of you would've crashed and burned already.

And what about those 37 people in the WTC1 basement structure who experienced the explosion(s) before the plane hit (who now have corroboration they were telling the truth by this new evidence).
http://www.jonhs.net/911/william_rodriguez.htm

This in itself is enough to warrant a new, real investigation of 9/11; or don't you people want to investigate further into this (we are talking about the deaths of nearly 3,000 people)?

Remember something called justice?

Of course, I know I am probably talking to the wall at this forum.