|
if all you want is for it to remain an unsupported, unsubstantiated theory.
But thusfar, that's what it is.
Make7 is right about it still being your theory, for which no proof has been offered.
Generally speaking, when introducing a theory, it is incumbent upon the person introducing it to provide a factual and evidentiary basis for the theory before it evolves beyond that of an unsubstantiated theory.
In this case, it's an interesting possible anomoly at present, but nothing more than that as yet. That said, by all means, proof of its accuracy is required. That will probably take more than an unsupported assertion that "it must have been" but if you have evidence, I'm sure it will be welcome here.
|