Reply #100: Re: "It is really simple"

[crispy]

> look at the photo closely the one with rummy and powell and compare it to anyone of the frames from the MSNBC photos.
> It does begin to look like quite a digital mockery. complete fraud I can not say but a too many questions are raised.

The camera is meant to take close-up pictures to monitor who enters and leaves the Pentagon area. Look behind Rumsfeld to far away - pretty blurry, eh? If you added JPEG compression to that photo, I bet it'd look just like the Pentagon crash photos. Matter of fact I'm going to go do that now.

Edit: Actually, first I'd like to know how you know that picture came from the Pentagon security camera.

> and if you really look closely at the sky and how it edges to the building toward the horizon it does seem to be painted in.
> Why too solid a blue and why to consistent a color of blue as it goes from the foregroundto the photo an into the horizon.

The same kind of sky is visible in one of Riskus' photos.
http://criticalthrash.com/terror/P1010011.JP(G)


> It looks to have TOO MANY ANGLES OR CURVES in the hull rather than it being sleek like the passenger hull of the boeing.

You're assuming it was a Boeing.