Reply #83: Dick

[LARED]

Many have seen the clip of an F-4 Phantom jet crashing into a solid block of concrete -- a very rapid deceleration case -- and yet, even with that extreme force of near instant decceleration -- there was no huge white hot explosion generated by the force.

If you had bothered to read what it said there was no fuel used on those experiments, only water to simulate the weight.

But in the case of the Pentagon we see tremendous force in the form of white hot-exposion that reaches 100 feet in the air (the Pentagon is 71 feet hight)

That would be the fuel explosion. Just like those seen in the world trade center.

-- we know it is not burning kerosene fuel that made that explosion --

Who is we?

(it was a single-engine jet fighter, by the way).

So, exactly what kind of fuel do those jets use anyway? You can't have it both ways. If "it is not burning kerosene fuel that made that explosion" and a jet fighter hit the wall just what kind of fuel was the jet fighter using? Fairy dust? Or was it powered by lizard men. That's right I forgot, it was a missile fired from the fighter jet right before it impacted the building. Which of course make complete and total sense if one lives in an alternate reality.

A question for you.

You state you work part time in a video store. The video stores I go to have 18 year olds manning the counters. So either you are independently wealthy and work in a video store for kicks, you live with mommy or you have other income. You also claim to be a propagandist. Is that your other income. Are you an Ickes wannabe trying to crete a Dick E's mythology for the irrational.