Reply #11: Really IMO that has been the case with Goldstone's report

[azurnoir]

from the day it made public, not what it said but was said about what it said, I doubt that many of commentators on the report have actually read it in it's entirety, it is a 'lugubrious' 500+ page report, mostly in 'legalese' and rather dry reading at that ie it's boring.
However it seems to me that the problem is to some is that it found any fault with IDF's conduct, when in fact Goldstone himself demanded the focus of the mission be changed from being entirely focused on Israel to being on all parties involved on both sides and that he found fault with both sides.