156. I don't have to. Its an OPINION. And even THAT opinion doesn't agree with you..
Edited on Fri May-07-10 05:25 AM by Tripmann
..that the land is held lawfully. Anyways.....
Individual opinion < unscr 242 < established princial of war.
Your contention of the INTENT of 4 words from the whole resolution < what is actually STATED in the resolution about inadmissibility of captured land
Game over.
You have proved nothing. Then again you never do.
But come on, tell us a story. Your american comedian friend hasn't weighed in yet with all the answers. Or is he busy giving a lecture on particle physics in between bouts of crimefighting :applause:
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
