You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: LOL!!! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Cthulu_2004 Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. LOL!!!
"I guess we need to rethink our idea of running a tripwire through our apartment which would let-loose a guillotine on an unsuspecting burgular, eh :)"

yup...they're flat-out illegal everywhere, even Texas.

In an after-the-fact review of your actions, the cops and prosecutors really don't have a whole lot to go on. However, the presence of a weapon like you described can very easily swing their opinion from thinking it was self-defense to thinking you're some kind of mideval weapons freak who was laying in wait for the first unsuspecting burglar to come along.

The law is kind of screwy. Often, if you THINK that they are armed, that's all that it takes unless circumstances would make a reasonable person know that they were unarmed. For instance, if a person caught a burglar at gunpoint, ordered him to his knees, and tied his hands behind his back and then shot him, well, that person's going to go away for a VERY long time because there's no basis for a reasonable belief that they are armed and a threat. On the other hand, if a burglar is carrying his lunch in his pocket, and reaches for his lunch to offer you a sandwich or a banana, so the person shot him thinking the bulge was a weapon, not many jurisdictions would prosecute.

Another thing to keep in mind is gender and race issues. I do not support this, I'm merely stating "the way it is" given the imperfect society that we live in. If a female is alone in the house and shoots an unarmed male burglar, she's less likely to be prosecuted than if a man did it. The same is unfortunately true of race. Size does matter, also. A 300 pound biker who shoots an unarmed 150 pound burglar is going to have a lot harder time avoiding prosecution than if the situation is reversed. So, if you're a white woman who weighs under a hundred pounds and are confronting a black male who weighs 230 pounds, you can pretty much blast away. There aren't going to be a whole lot of people who would think that the 98 pound white woman wasn't in fear for her life. That's a hell of a commentary on our society, isn't it? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC