Reply #63: Astounding. She's complaining that Eels was armed, but doesn't seem

[gravity556]

to question what a group of teenagers was doing out fucking robbing people with a gun at 2 in the morning. She has no idea that the actions of the idiot shitbag crooks were the ultimate reason they got shot. Had they not tried to fucking rob someone, particularly not someone who was willing to be a victim and had the means with which to protect himself, they wouldn't be shot and wouldn't be facing criminal charges. But oh, no, it's the law abiding citizen's fault for having the stones to stand up to a group of violent bullies that he got shot, and it's all his fault that the fucking crook got shot as well.

As for a gunshot wound in the back, don't you think the cowardly little fuck might have shot as he turned to run away? And even if he was starting to run away, why presume he's not going to fire back over his shoulder as he runs? He already tried to kill you for refusing to be robbed. Unless he threw his gun away when he started to run, he's still a lethal threat. Do you think cops won't shoot a running man who's carrying a gun who has already fired on them? Unless he throws his gun, he's a threat. At least until he's out of pistol range (can't hit you) or is out of sight (can't see you). Throwing yourself on the mercy of a psychopath is a fantastic move if you have no survival instinct.