Reply #90: a cloo for yoo

[iverglas]

http://www.midlandsconnect.com/news/story.aspx?id=644050

That's one of the original reports, in which no mention is made of any intended sexual assault.

So take your "read this" crap and tell it to somebody else.


Had she been a male victim, no one would have embarked on fantasies about sexual assault.
You do realize that 19% of rape victims aged 12 and over are males? The majority of which are raped by strangers. And again, I'm not sure where you are getting the idea that this is a fantasy. I may suggest you read the article.

What the fuck does how many rape victims are male have to do with anything I said? Quite apart from the fact that your figure is nonsense. By the way, men are not raped. Rape is an act of sexual violence committed against a woman, and an instrument used by men throughout time and space to control, intimidate, terrorize and subjugate women. It has nothing at all to do with sexual assaults committed against men.


And again, I'm not sure where you are getting the idea that this is a fantasy.

I do know where you got the idea that I said any such thing was a fantasy. Not from anywhere labelled "the truth", that's for sure.


So, what exactly happened here in this case? Was this woman, who was carrying a gun, not defending herself with a gun that she was carrying?

It becomes painful having to explain things so slowly and in words of so few syllables that they will be understood around here.

A person carrying a firearm is not DEFENDING THEMSELF against anything.

A person who uses a firearm may be defending themself against something.

How bleeding obvious is that, now?


You are mistaken that the likes of the gun dungeon don't actually give a shit about victims of rape.

No I'm not.

They may all care oh so deeply about their wives, daughters, etc. They're theirs, after all.

There it stops. The proof is in the pudding, friend.