Reply #67: I cited others proof. If you have a problem with Kleck's research then YOU

[Bold Lib]

need to debunk it. So far all I'm hearing from you is that you don't believe it but you have no, zip, nada, empirical evidence that disputes Kleck's findings. Please, if you have ANY valid, factual information that calls into question his research, method, or findings then lets have it. Your opinion or flat out stubbornness in simply not believe his research does not establish any valid error or question of his work.

I actually expect people to believe research and findings that have been peer reviewed and VALIDATED; your opinion, not so much.

TWO MILLION defensive gun uses every year by law abiding gun owners. Game, set, match.