Reply #127: What?

[Deadric Damodred]

"And in my opinion, anyone who owns a firearm should have been reviewed and assessed before being permitted to have access to it, and his/her possession/use of it should be subject to ongoing review and assessment -- by the public."

By the public -- do you mean that even people who hold no office should be able to have a say in whether a person should be allowed to keep their firearms? Pretty much anyone that lives in the area can just up and say "nope, I don't think that guy should keep his guns (his personal property that HE paid for with his hard earned money)? And if that's the case, what about the cost of the person's firearms? Will the public, provided they've had a little "vote" that Joe Blow shouldn't keep his guns, endure the costs of paying Joe Blow for his $10,000 in personal property that they have decided he shouldn't own anymore?