Reply #44: I suggest that

[BullDozer]

You should learn to use the cut and past feature of your computer since you are so clearly unable to accurately quote people on a consistent basis.


"This is exactly something I expect that any advocacy group does and something that members of a group deserve to receive as a service."

To those of us that comprehend English that is clearly not a blanket claim that all advocacy groups have lists of those in opposition to their goals.

and I guess that claim other advocacy groups had them is a load.....

Gee bunkley who do you think can meet the burden of proof first, you who will have to show that the NRA is the only group to have a similar list or I who just has to find one group who has one?

Ooops I guess you lose http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=50.
(you will have to look at the link as SPL has a copyright disclaimer in place "Reproduction of material from any SPLCenter.org pages is strictly prohibited.")

I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the contents of that link it's merely used to show that groups do indeed produce lists similar to that which the NRA has.

Is it supposed to my fault that members of some groups don't get the same service from theirs that others can get from the NRA for $10 a year? I happen to like having a list of National Organizations With Anti-Gun Policies and Anti-Gun Lobbying Organizations available to me.

You can whine all you want but until you can show that it's an enemies list and not merely a list of those who support or are vocal about their support of positions contrary to that which the NRA takes then once again you don't have a leg to stand on.