http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=119761And an asinine one at that. Basically, she feels that on as well as a ban on handguns, a law should be passed requiring any non-restricted firearm to be protected by 24-hour security measures both passive and active. In her words...
"I might suggest that "active security" could be satisfied by functioning burglar alarms, not easily defeated, to which someone can be expected / is required to actually respond. Although personally, I'd prefer a physical human presence in addition -- i.e. along with a mechanical alarm system, locks and thick steel -- as an alarm system, not really as a defence system. That way it would be a little less tempting to try to defeat either the mechanical or the human alarm."
A thick steel vault with armed guards. I guess the poor will have to count on the cops for protection--good thing they're known for their fast response to incidents in bad neighborhoods.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
