You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: It May Not Be Efficient, BUT [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. It May Not Be Efficient, BUT
Edited on Sat Jun-09-07 05:54 AM by VogonGlory
The plant may not be all that efficient, but it does do something useful with those tons of turkey litter that were piling up. Unless someone has a brighter idea as to what to do with the turkey waste, burning the stuff to generate electricity is as good a way as any to see to it that the waste doesn't get into the water supply.

Of course, burning coal also means strip mining the coal out of the western prairies, transporting it long distance on long, ground-shaking unit coal trains, then burning it in conventional, polluting, coal-fired power plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC