You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: But again apparently the classification is not based on how many will die or get sick, it's [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But again apparently the classification is not based on how many will die or get sick, it's
based on how long-term the problem will be and how severe, etc. When I heard it was classified the same as Chernoybl I thought immediately, as many deaths as Chernobyl has caused and I asked my husband about it. He said no, even if not even one person died (unfortunately people will die as the posters here say) it would still be classified as bad as Chernobyl based on how long-term the problem is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC