You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: You have to look at lifetime [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. You have to look at lifetime
Edited on Wed Apr-06-11 03:58 PM by Confusious
because if you looked at the subsidies it receives today, right now, it would receive less, per KWH, then renewables.

You're pulling a shell game. Don't look at today because that would make renewables look bad, look at the lifetime.

"wind are already competitive with coal and rapidly declining costs for solar that are competitive with natural gas and will soon be less expensive than coal."

Sure, if you don't look at the subsidies they receive. Of course you don't. I don't think I've ever seen a post from you showing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC