You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #65: So, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
tama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. So,
What are we really speaking about here?

No matter what, at current pace all fossile fuels will peak relatively soon (this century, while our kids live their lives). And more and faster we burn them, the more abrupt the climate change will be and adjusting more painfull.

Renewable grid can or could be built (though jury is still out if that could be done sustainably, EROEI wise etc.) and renewables can or could substitute some of the fossile - how much in a given time frame, nobody can really say. What is certain is that what powers that be publicly plan is too far too little far too late and they cannot be trusted to be able to deliver even that little. What is even more crucial, the social model based on continuous growth (driven by banking system based on interest... on interest) cannot endure stagnation, even less diminishing energy resources. And the fact is, world energy per capita peaked allready in 1979 and the global ecomy since than has been based on inflating humongous financial bubble and pillaging of last remaining natural and human resources at ever increasing pace, not real growth of real economy like it was earlier last century. And when foundation (growth) crumbles away from a social order based on growth, what happens is what happens to every pyramid fraud. Just on a scale never seen before.

That's what implied by the lesson from Cuba. It proves that soft landing is possible, at least in principle and in a socialist society, just like even double or triple our numbers could live sustainably on this planet as organic gardeners, in principle. But what matters is practise in the social reality of capitalism, where every VIP keeps on thinking, speaking and acting in terms of unlimited growth and consumption. And all actions for the insanity of unlimited growth is away from adopting to sustainable way of life with as soft landing as can be achieved.

To summarize:
- Unlimited growth in limited environment is impossible, simple as that.
- The energy ceiling has been hit allready (1979 to be exact) and things will get only worse in that respect this century
- To avoid suffering that could be avoided - "soft landing" - the causes of the problem of growthmania need to be understood so we can stop causing it. Meaning that the whole capitalistic social order must change, starting from declaring again interest (aka usury) suicidal sin.

To end with a more positive note, the collaps of the capitalistic/corporate fascist system which creates mainly misery and suffering is of course not a bad thing but a good thing. It opens up wonderfull new opportunities. During and after the collapse I see three main tendencies, happening simultaneously in different locations:
1) Mad Max style barbarianism ("gun toting survivalists and zombie herds")
2) Socialism (on state levels, aiming for global socialist state, "soft landers")
3) Ecoanarchism (small self sufficient permaculture communities aka "ecovillages" governed by anarchistic principles ("seed planters"))

I've allready gone through my socialist stage (in a trotter group), currently I'm learning gardening and dreaming of moving to an ecovillage. :)








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC