You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: I understand that is a popular perception, but it isn't correct. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I understand that is a popular perception, but it isn't correct.
Edited on Tue May-13-08 10:18 PM by kristopher
I take it you acknowledge that producing LIon batteries isn't a particularly toxic endeavor.

In light of the scale of available to be tapped raw resources, renewables are a vastly larger pool of energy than all the fossils we could possible extract; so I don't understand your claim that "there simply aren't enough to power the autobahn and keep the lights on."

Look at the energy requirement as NNadir likes to phrase it, as a massive whole. And lets switch the discussion back to the US so I don't have to grope around for the numbers.

In 2005 the US consumed about 100 quadrillion Btus of energy. About 40 quads of that was petroleum for transportation. The personal transportation sector is about 75% of that for 30 quads. Does that mean we need an additional 30 quads for the grid if we shift to battery electric?

No, it doesn't.

If we start with the grid as it is presently configured, what happens?

First, because of the efficiency gains of electric drive over internal combustion we only need about 15% (4.5 quads) of that 30 quads to be added to the grid. That's right, to provide for the personal transportation sector we need to add only 4.5 quads of delivered capacity to the grid.

That of course, is a rough sketch.


It leaves out a close examination of grid efficiency, and it leaves out reduced driving demand as higher transportation costs for everything push people into a more communal lifestyle; AND it doesn't take into account that it would likely result in more efficient use of the current grid as much of the spinning reserve that operates overnight is now productively used to charge batteries.

With that final point alone, there may be very little need to at any capacity at all to the grid.

A coal generator is huge; they are so long and heavy that the shaft sags if it isn't spinning. So standby power provided by coal, even when it is only going to be used for a couple of hours in the afternoon, is supplied by keeping those generators running 24/7. Utilizing that power is a huge efficiency gain.

I'll stop there, but if you are interested we can put more flesh on this carcass.

Edit: I really should proof this stuff before hitting send... 17 typos...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC