You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: yes, but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. yes, but
this deficit is a real time bomb. Read an arguement today which makes the case that it is much like the 60's when LBJ tried to provide Great Society programs along with Vietnam spending and it ran the deficit higher and led to hikes in interest rates and later the inflation of the 70's. Bush not wanting to touch his tax cuts and wanting additional spendig in Iraq at $87 billion per year is almost identical to the 1960's scenerio.

Besides, the minimal tax cut the working man got from the Bush tax cuts are being whiped away from increased fees, taxes, and spending cuts at the state level. Soon on the national level domestic programs will also be affected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC