You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: Here's a review that reflects how I felt about this movie: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-15-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here's a review that reflects how I felt about this movie:
http://www.examiner.com/x-488-Movie-Examiner~y2009m8d15-Movie-review-District-9-avoid-this-movie-at-all-costs

Bad: I swore to myself that I wouldn't use the word "shit" or any variation of the term in this movie review. So now that I've tied both hands painfully behind my back review-wise let the verbal beating begin...

For the first ten minutes of District 9 we're treated to a sci-fi film opening with so much promise, so much outstanding potential - I could understand why folks were going ga-ga over this flick. The aliens have arrived. They're in bad shape. We've put them in camps. Everything looks documented and real. Whatever bad things I have to say concerning District 9, panning the film's opening wont' be one of them.

But as the movie rolled forward I started noticing that the acting seemed a bit off. Not totally rotten just yet, but definitely strolling in that direction. Which didn't seem to compute. This is a serious sci-fi flick right? It's got Peter Jackson's name on the poster right? The opening ten minutes of mockumentary footage were so convincing, so absolutely impressive in scale and dramatic value that the movie following them must be a movie of singular quality right? So why's everybody acting like we're in a low-grade zombie picture? How did this major sci-fi event film, (as it was advertised) suddenly become a cheese-grade splatter movie? And why weren't any of us warned about this?

District 9 is a bad movie. I'd say it's a bad B-movie but that's not totally correct either. It's a bad B-video-game-movie. If you've played any video games you're already aware that it doesn't take much to craft a convincing plot for a medium based solely on zoning out and killing stuff. You might need a dude who can shoot fire out of his eyes, or can meld weapons to his flesh, or has a retractable claw for an arm, and that's pretty much all it will take to get your common video-gamer on the couch and crushing buttons. But I doubt any sane filmmaker would ever base an entire film on a flimsy device like that. Or better stated, I "used" to doubt that. With District 9 I'm not so sure any more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC