Your professor makes me angry. He had an obligation to protect that child and any other the abuser might take a hankerin for. Instead the decided to define disruptive through the eye of the abuser. Think of the "disruption" the child endured.
The point of the thread: I do not think the two are mutually exclusive. A person can get time in prison and be forgiven by his victim. I have seen many victims forgive their abusers, but want to ensure that they don't do it to anyone else, and also to pay for what they did through time in prison.
I guess it depends on the definition of forgiveness.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
