You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: No, your offer was condescending [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. No, your offer was condescending
and the whole tone of your post implied that RainDog was at fault. She stated her credentials and were extremely dismissive of all of her accomplishments. After that, did you honestly think she would turn to you for help. What? So you could discourage her some more?

But, of course, everyone who finds themselves in bad circumstances are the cause of their own misfortune because that appears to be the premise upon which you base your world view. Someone's hand is tied behind their back and then they are criticized for not winning the fight.

I, too, believe in personal responsibility but I also understand that the deck really is stacked against some people and segments of society. The corporate and societal structure is constructed to maintain wealth and class distinctions. Sure, there is some room for upward mobility and every once in awhile we have the stellar rags to riches story to inspire everyone to keep struggling. Those who break through this limiting structure are the exception rather than the rule.

I have personally met RainDog and she does not have an "attitude" as you have suggested. A really don't care for intellectually dishonest debating tactics that some people engage in around here, especially when it comes to deliberately tweaking others. When they respond with justified defensiveness and anger, they are then chastised or mocked.

Thus, the issue is obscured and we don't focus on the matter at hand, rather the personality or attitude of the poster with whom there is a disagreement becomes the issue. I think many here can see through such obvious ploys.

You don't know anything of her life and what personal challenges that she has had to face. I certainly don't think it is fair for you to pass judgment on her based on an interaction with you on a message board. I am her friend, and although you may think that clouds my judgment, I certainly am in a much better position to assess her attitude than you. RainDog is very intelligent, quite articulate, friendly and engaging.

Perhaps it would be best and certainly more productive to stick to the topics were are discussing rather than sidetrack the discussion with smears on those who are posting within the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC