Reply #13: And the bullet comes out clean on the other side?

[MadHound]

Riiiiight. Sorry, but that dog won't hunt. How can you have a bullet rip through dense muscle, hard bone, leaving many fragments of itself in the two bodies(in fact Connaly still carries some lead from that day), and yet this very same bullet turns up in pristine condition at Parkland Hospital. Explain that one away.

While you're at it, explain away basic laws of physics, ie how an object that is supposedly struck from the back is seen moving towards the force expended. Whirl that one up so that Newton doesn't spin in his grave.

Ooo Ooo, I've got another physics law for you to explain away too. How does an entrance wound wind up being extremely larger than the exit wound? In every other case, the exit wound is larger than the entrance wound. Why does this one violate the laws of physics?

And tell me, how is it that Oswald was able to get three shots off in 5.6 seconds from a notoriously bad gun, shooting through heavy foliage at a moving target. Not only that, but in 9 out of ten cases, the first shot is the best shot. In this case, it is the last shot that is the kill shot. Do you realize that six FBI sharpshooters tried fire off three shots(without even aiming) shots in 5.6 seconds, and could only get off two? What, did Oswald have the magic Italian rifle in addition to the magic bullet? Sheesh, and people say conspiracy theorists are nuts!

One last thing, what makes you a better judge of what went on than the House Select Committee on Assasinations? Did you see all of the evidence? They did. Did you hear all of the expert testimony? They did. And this was a group of people who were actually designed to put the conspiracy theories to rest. But the case was so convincing that they had to reluctantly conclude that there was at least a fourth shot, if not more, hence a conspiracy. What do you have to back your theories up? The Warren Report? Hah, that piece of fiction was debunked long ago, by the very government that initially put it out.

Give it up, your stance on this matter is wholly without merit.