Reply #113: You obviously have not read

[hiaasenrocks]

the trial facts. I've posted them all over this thread and others. And if you believe the TV "Law and Order" meaning of "circumstantial" (i.e. not adequate) then you have a misunderstanding of the justice system. Prisons are full of people who were convicted on circumstantial evidence. It is NOT bad evidence.

And it doesn't matter what a defendant SAYS, it matters what the evidence (circumstantial or direct) says. And it matters what numerous appeals have stated.

Please read the trial evidence.

What is this "nice try" thing? I said if not judging him works for you, that's fine. But that doesn't mean that's how other people approach things. You have proved that you pick and choose your judgments. That is your right. Your hypothetical is not analogous to this case. The defendant is not your family member, so why are you asking me what I would do if mine were in that position. My family members aren't gang members nor have they committed four murders...something you won't judge him about. Great.

Justice will be served on December 13th. Please don't forget the victims.