You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: they wouldn't alter the 2 terms rule [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
TexasPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. they wouldn't alter the 2 terms rule
W would bow out after 2... and hand the baton to Jeb - who'll run the show for 8 more years. If Bush wins this time, it's Bushes for 12 years.

By then - considering the new policy of preemptive war - we're back to the great game. Imperialism couched in christian dogma and us vs them outgrouping. Pak and India will go to town - because Bush wants them to. Lots of death and destruction around the globe - as Hicks put it, a lot of expats will be victims of american foreign policy.

weeping and moaning and gnashing of teeth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC