You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #135: Your analysis in poorly drawn and elitist [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
135. Your analysis in poorly drawn and elitist
From the posts I have read here, I would not get that cocky about the average IQ on DU.

There are some very bright and well read folks here, no doubt. But more than occasionally, the dialog fails to impress.

The general notion that conservative issues have been marketed on emotional appeal much more effectively than issues recent centrist democrats have run on is reasonably sound.

The concept that the emotional approach works better in 30 second bites is obvious.

The idea that the left is intellectually based and the right by definition based in ill-informed emotions is simply wrong.

First, if you want to see the emotions of the left, just start a Green party bashing thread. There is rarely any intellectual analysis that crops up in one of these, but they go on and on nonettheless.

Second, we cannot consign our ideas to perpetual wonkishness. Feeding poor kids has emotional appeal. Not blowing up strangers with our military over lies and misrepresentations has basic emotional appeal. Getting people who, to quote Clinton "work hard and play by the rules" a decent living wage has emotional appeal.

Our pResident started dropping 2000 pound bombs on a city with a civilian population of 4 million people before, according to Condi Rice, "He read the entire report" about the putative threat posed by Iraq. It sounds like the act of someone who did not feel that the lives of innocents were worth an hour or two of his time. This has emotional appeal, when the correct approach is used.

We need a candidate with the spine to state things directly and as necessary in emotional terms. Most folks are afraid this will illict anger which can be unpredictable and thus choose to keep the discussion in milder waters. Anger in the cause of justice is no sin. Republicans have known that emotions can be a strong motivator to drive good turnout and have used anger and fear heavily in their campaigns. To win we need to want it enough to be prepared to fire back.

By the way, the middle of the bell curve, by definition always represents the majority of the population. It nearly always occurs between the 80 and 20 percentile range. Know your stats or state them better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC