You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: This article is misleading, perhaps inadvertantly [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. This article is misleading, perhaps inadvertantly
To suggest that "Rehm is one of 11 people from Dover... who want to block their school board from requiring the reading..." is to suggest that Rehm belongs to a tiny, fringe minority.

It would be more accurate to say something like "Rehm, along with the entirety of the legitimate scientific community, objects to the tip-of-the-wedge pro-creationist strategy by which far-Right extremists are attempting to force fringe-Christianity into public education."

The article is useful in any case; thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC