Reply #54: since we know that the MSM is no longer any more reliable than

[hardrainfallin]

the NE (remember how they decried serious PhDd researchers as "internet conspiracy theorists", serious PhDd scholars who put their reputations and livelihoods on the line when the MSM refused to print anything remotely related to the truth about the fraudulent election practices in this country), NONE of these sources is reliable.

What is reliable are your own EYES, and the eyes, ears and experiences of people who are familiar with the disease in question (alcoholism) and are saying, in increasing numbers, that there is good reason to suspect that the patient is experiencing sever recidivism.

He's drunk.

The ONLY reliable way to substantiate or debunk the hypothesis is through a blood or urine analysis.

You'd think that Katrina might have taught people in this country to believe their eyes--and the scientists.