You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: Other key comments made yesterday: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other key comments made yesterday:
....

Senator Richard Durbin: "Instead of calling a vote, should call the White House. Because if they will produce the basic information which and his staff had access to . . . it's the end of the controversy. Clearly, there is something in those documents which is so damaging to Bolton, they don't want to release it."
White House spokesperson Erin Healy: "This is about partisan politics, not about documents. They have the information they need."

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist: "Democrats keep moving the goalposts."

Senator Christopher Dodd: "If the goal posts have been moved at all, they've been moved in the administration's direction"

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid: "As long as the White House is not allowing the information to come forward, there's going to be no change in the vote."


Senator Frist seems to be nuking the Bolton nomination by calling for a second cloture vote which will fail. With Pryor defecting, the White House is losing even more ground on Bolton.

This doesn't mean that those opposing Bolton are sure to win.

The White House could surprise us all by providing generous access to the NSA intercepts and names of redacted identities of U.S. individuals. Condi Rice could say that since the State Department provided other "documents on policy deliberation" to the Foreign Relations Committee on Bolton, she might as well send over the documents on Bolton's planned Syria testimony in 2003. And White House ethics could send over the roster of Matthew Freedman's international clients, which he maintained while pulling down more than $110,000 a year for a part-time gig with John Bolton's office as "Special Assistant."

The White House could provide these three modest packages of information -- and the vote on Bolton would occur very soon after.

TWN hopes that the material is enough to derail a couple of other Senators on Bolton, but the White House could still surprise us with a dose of magnanimity.
more
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC