Reply #39: I read the article in its entirety....

[Bread and Circus]

and I can't say they proved anything. Seems
like a lot of quotes taken out of context,
strung together in a clever way to paint a
negative picture about Clark.

Anyone with half a brain can do that about anyone
of the candidates, especially Dean (even though I
kind of like Dean).

Ultimately, you have to ask yourself the real
question:

Who the f*ck can do the best job of getting us
out of this mess?

If Kucinich or whoever is your man for that job,
then fine, whatever, give me a good reason why you think
so.

An opinion piece like this is no better than
all the other conspiracy crap I read here on DU.

Frankly, people are just worried Clark is going to
whip their candidate's ass and suck all of his/her
political oxygen. That's all this anti-Clark tidal
wave is. People really don't have any real
negative dirt about him. They have to insinuate shit
and make stuff up.

Now that Clark is a candidate it is time for him to
step up and do what we think he can do. I hope he
proves the Clark supporters right. We have been right so
far at least when it comes to all the nay saying we
have had to put up with for that past few months here.

Now that Clark is a candidate, the gloves are off. We
have a right to defend him against spurious attacks and
"hit-and-run" articles.

We will have to see who America thinks is the best man for the
job in terms of security. It's that opinion which matters most
right now, for better or for worse.