You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #144: Your case was that people [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #81
144. Your case was that people
"need to judge people based on their words and actions, and not on their personal philosophies."

But if people explicitly base their words and actions in religion (as above), then they're actions and their religion are the same thing. Thus any judgment on said action or religion is, by that person's definition, a judgment on the corresponding religion or action..

You are making the case that religion should get a pass. You're making a case that intelligent people should not respond to the religious aspects of the argument. I think not. Absolutely not. Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC