You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #63: I think a little clearing up is necessary [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
63. I think a little clearing up is necessary
No one is trying to link being gay with being a pedaphile.
I think you should read this: http://www.johnnygosch.com/gunderson_report.html specifically, because it discusses that the prostitution ring was comprised of both gay prostitutes AND children.
"Politicians, dignitaries, wealthy business people. Young people. Larry, as far as I could gather, I left when I stared putting the pieces together, you know, realizing there were two sets of books.
"There were very, various discrepancies in the credit union. And the fact that he obviously was into pimping gay prostitutes and children too, basically for influence purposes. Whether it be politicians or whatever.

As someone who posted some on the thread and (mostly) watched the thread in question unfold last night, no one suggested that there is a definitive link between being abused as a child and growing up to be gay. In fact, I think someone asked *if* there was any research in this regard and others said there wasn't.
It's not about being gay: it's about being sold to the elite for a power trip over children and young adults. Period.
Now, whether Gannon is Gosch is pure speculation based on some simliarities between the young boy and Jim Guckert. It may be hogwash, but I think the clear passageway to the "smoking gun," if you will, is the prostitution - gay, straight or in the abduction of children. It's the illegal activity.
Seriously, why would someone use the name Jim Gannon that could so easily been linked to the weird goings-on in the Gosch case? It quite possibly be pure coincidence, but why not check it out?
Besides, it's an interesting theory and brings back into the forefront the issue regarding Lawrence King, Franklin and the, guess who? Republican Party.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC