You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #61: Autoimmune? How can you tell? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Dear Maggie Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Autoimmune? How can you tell?
OK

When I started learning about 2-butoxyethanol harm in earnest - June, 2002, I found from the information on the chemical that it causes hemolytic anemia. And yet, people with known harm to it, have not been diagnosed with it. Doctors seem to find the secondary effects and the multiple other add on ailments it causes, but not the 'fatigue' that no rest helps. (It should start immediately and last)

But it does appear to be autoimmune hemolytic anemia ... acquired ... for the group I first started studying, the Exxon Valdez oil spill cleanup workers.

Then, I suspect it to be the 'gulf war syndrome' vets primary exposure of harm. In talking to a lot of people in both of these groups, it seems that it is autoimmune. The child of a gulf war vet died last year at the age of 10 ... from autoimmune hepatitis, her body turned on her liver and destroyed it. She died one month after diagnosis Maybe SIDS is not age related

Comparing what CFS & CFIDS symptoms are and you would start seeing these as the 'civilian gulf war syndrome' groups

All of the things I've heard about from all of these groups, sounds like the harm of 2-butoxyethanol. It does it all. The fatigue the doctors aren't finding, I believe, is AIHA. It is a provable harm if more is checked in the red blood cells and if other tests are re-looked at when the red blood cells are found to be mostly immature and there is trace blood in urine for many years.

So, back to this autoimmune feature. If it is primary to harm of the red blood cells and the liver and the colon & other functions, how is it tested for? How can doctors not only recognize that it is there, but that possibly it is the primary cause of harm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC