Reply #139: This will not be resolved on this discussion board.

[BevHarris]

I will be happy to meet face to face in a more appropriate venue to resolve these issues. In the morass of replies above, I see two issues:

1. The issue of whether David Allen / Plan Nine failed to perform (typeset, fulfill Amazon orders, send monthly sales reports, send monthly royalty checks as required by the contract).

2. Hurt feelings about back-and-forth over Qui Tam allegations.

On Point #1, David Allen responds by changing the subject to point two. It is an easily resolvable issue (just post the monthly sales reports and cancelled checks, if they actually exist). The best place to resolve it will be in a more formal setting.

Point two is more complex. I need the full set of answers. Those answers will not come from debate on a forum. Tracking down the answers is not a good use of our limited time and resources while the clock is running down just prior to an election.

We need to keep our eye on the ball and get results, day after day, in order to get proper auditing in place for the election -- and that does NOT mean electronic verification. While some people here spent the day digging up old threads, we were on the road from 9 a.m. to 2:30 a.m. working on uncovering what's needed to protect the fall election.

There's a time and place to resolve the above. Now isn't the time, and DU isn't the place.

Because the important issues (nine new stories with more to come) are getting buried in conflict, in order to avoid further distraction, we will not be posting any more stories on DU.

Bev Harris