|
The President of the United States had been receiving recent Intelligence indicated there were threats against American landmarks in Washington and New York . So, he wants us to BELIEVE that his first thought upon seeing "this plane fly into the first building" was "I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake." This is what he WANTS us to believe. Do YOU believe that?
What is the truth, here folks?
1: Bush is mistaken or is lying. He DID NOT see the first plane fly into the WTC. He is confused. Or making up a story to make himself sound important. Or stoned. Or SOMETHING! And yet he says this not once but TWICE.
2: Bush is telling the truth. He DID see the first plane fly into the WTC before going into the classroom. "I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower." STUPIDLY he thought, "I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot."
Clearly HE WANTS US TO THINK HE HAD NO IDEA THIS COULD BE A TERRORIST ATTACK OR AN ACT OF WAR. This is supposed to explain his TOTAL LACK OF RESPONSE to what he says he knew was taking place.
Where was he "sitting" before he went into the classroom? He was "sitting" in the presidential limosine (which we know to be stocked with high-tech communications equipment) on the way to the school from his motell. See the timeline linked in the original post. Is THAT where the president was at 8:46 am on Tuesday morning 9/11 when the first plane hit the WTC? Was the President watching a secure, closed circuit broadcast of the plane actually striking the tower as it happened? If so, WHO was taking THOSE pictures?
Absolutely unbelievable, isn't it? Not possible. And, even if by some insanity he WAS a witness to mass murder, WHY WOULD HE EVER ADMIT IT?
But that is just it, folks. We don't KNOW why the man who calls himself the President of the United States of America SAID these things, not once, but TWICE. We DON'T KNOW. No one has ever asked him why he said these things. The PRESS hasn't asked him. The COMMITTEE appointed to investigate these matters hasn't asked him. No one ELSE has asked him. AND THAT, I maintain, IS ITSELF HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS. Why do we have NO EXPLANATION for this? Either he is mistaken or he is lying or he is telling the truth. Either he saw it or he didn't. Either he was caught completely off guard or he is dissembling.
WHICH IS IT, MR pRESIDENT?
|