Reply #15: ELECTION FRAUD IN NEW HAMPSHIRE?

[anarchy1999]

Don't believe for a moment that the system isn't being tested and being readied for use.


snip:

JANUARY 28, 2004. I watched the vote count from the beginning, for about six hours.

At the start of network coverage, just after the polls closed, Kerry was listed with 38% of the vote, and Dean with 24%. That was with 14% of the precincts counted.

During the next six hours, I saw Kerry vary only one point, up to 39%. Dean went as high as 26%.

This morning, MSNBC is stating that, with 99% of all voting precincts reporting, Kerry is at 38% and Dean is at 26%.

Kerry is exactly where he began. Dean is two points higher than where he began, but exactly where he sat most of the night.

I don’t care whether they mostly used paper ballots or punch cards or touch screens. As the vote unfolded from minute to minute on TV---and they kept updating, showing the changing count of total votes cast for the various candidates on a continuously running basis---SOMEHOW THE PERCENTAGES FOR KERRY AND DEAN REMAINED VERY NEARLY UNCHANGED

http://nomorefakenews.com/