You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: That's not the case, though. Miller was the first in June 2003. It's in [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. That's not the case, though. Miller was the first in June 2003. It's in
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 05:56 PM by Garbo 2004
the indictment.

Libby's conversation with Russert was in July. You're buying Libby's lie that he talked to Russert about Wilson (and that's how he learned of Plame's identity). When clearly he already knew and was talking about it to Miller before his July conversation with Russert when he complained about Tweety.

I'm thinking maybe in Fall 2003 when Libby had to find a source, thinking the investigation would be buried in Ashcroft's DOJ and no journos would ever be forced to testify, he simply went to his phone log and picked a DC insider media person he did talk to in the relevant time frame (July) who might plausibly have the info. Thinking it would never come to the test and disclosure. Not just his conversation with Russert, but his weeks earlier conversation with Judy Miller. By the time Fitz came on the scene, Libby was married to the main points of his story and couldn't easily retract them. The "I forgot" defense didn't work.

Remember, it wasn't just Russert's statements to Fitz passed on to the grand jury that sunk Libby, it was also Miller's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC