You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Well, that's a tough question [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well, that's a tough question
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 05:29 PM by mongo
Under Federal law, and 40 states ANY explicit movie is chargable as "obscenity". I can be arrested for ANY movie in my inventory.

Many states outlaw the sale of "adult novelties" (dildos and vibrators) too.

But - we don't have prior restraint of free speech in America. They can't ban the filming of an act outright (unless it is the filming of a crime, as in child porn).

So, in order for a movie to be actually obscene and therefore illegal, a jury has to apply the Miller test:

Miller test
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Miller test is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labelled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited.

The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California. It has three parts:

* Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
* Whether the work depicts/describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law,
* Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The third condition is also known as the SLAPS test. The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

Most places getting a conviction is a crapshoot and costly for the prosecution, so they don't bother. But it is why you don't find a lot of adult outlets in Utah.

On Edit: I sould state that it is perfectly LEGAL for you to own pornography - even if it is "obscene". It is only illegal for me to sell it to you. Go figure on that one for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC