You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #112: Oh ok [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
LoganW Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
112. Oh ok
"1) You can’t tell Christians they are responsible for “their religion”. If you didn’t know, the Christian church in America is atomized into a thousand separate Christian sects, and they don’t answer to each other. They barely recognize each others’ existence. Some are no bigger than a single church in a single town. It’s easier to place responsibility on the secular as Bush’s fellow Americans than it is to place responsibility on the Christians as fellow Christians."

Then why do BOTH sides sit around bitching that the others aren't "real christians". As far as I'm concerned all the sects are nuts.

"2) You can’t tell Christians that their religion isn’t valid. Well, you can, but you look stupid. Why? "

Funny how the sects sit around telling each other their religion isn't valid.

"3) You can’t tell Christians that their faith is inconsistent with being liberal or being democrats. Well, again, it would be stupid. Martin Luther King. Jesse Jackson. Jimmy Carter. Heck, even John Kerry and Bill Clinton were committed churchgoers. These people found their best in religion."

You can also find your worst in religion. I would argue it was not religion at all that brought out the best in them.

"Separation of church and state is what makes a discussion of the validity of any particular religion unnecessary."

BS. If there were millions of americans who all of a sudden adopted a belief system that told them jumping up and down twice would eventually let them fly would we have to accept the validity of that? Of course not. With every other type of invalid belief we would not accept it, yet with religion we just have to automatically assume validity?

"Christians who happen to be here"

If you post your religion on a public message board you should expect discussion, including the validity of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC