You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: What does this statement mean to you? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. What does this statement mean to you?
Native Americans Bear the Nuclear Waste Burden

Uranium Industry and Indigenous Peoples of North America
ftp://ftp.halcyon.com/pub/FWDP/Americas/four_dir.txt

"The most common health risk associated with uranium
mining is breathing radon-222 gas, which continues to seep
from the crushed ore and mill tailings for hundreds of
thousands of years. It is therefore essential to contain
this material, and prevent it from either blowing away or
spilling into water supplies. Responding to the widely
publicized discovery that more than 600 homes in Grand
Junction, Colorado, had been built on top of uranium mill
tailings (House Report No. 95-649 <1978>), Congress targeted
22 abandoned uranium mines and mills for remedial action. "

__________________________________

"The potential long-range health and environmental
hazards of uranium mining and milling, especially for
communities still dependent for a major part of their
subsistence on hunting or fishing, need to be fully and
publicly assessed before a project proceeds. Nowhere is
there a stronger case for participation by indigenous
peoples in the planning and supervision of development
activities, or for their right to determine whether such
activities will be permitted in their vicinity at all. In
none of the uranium-mining projects described above was
there a thorough advance assessment of risks, so far as we
can ascertain, and the wishes of the indigenous community
were taken into consideration only in those cases where the
mine was to be physically located on land recognized as
their property. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that
much of the human cost of North American uranium production
has been borne, unwittingly and mostly unwillingly, by
indigenous peoples. "


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC