Reply #199: Because that would be a lie

[Blue_Chill]

I refer you higher up in the thread where someone else is trying to advance the view that rights are only violated when physical force is involved. Thats a really stupid argument.

No it isn't. Saying that if you see something you disagree with your rights have been violated is stupid.


Who was talking about a piece of art in the park? Once again you return to your propaganda talk. Suddenly a clearly religious statue of the ten commandments is refferred to as only art. CAn you read what you write with a straight face?

that courts are talking about it. Not all seperation issues are about court houses, and the orignal post in this thread did not limit the discussion to court houses.

yes I can read what I write with a straight face, it your moronic posts that make me laugh. You keep losing ground and attempting to turn the entire discussion about Talabama which is only one situation of many.

Diversity is letting people of all faiths practice freely. You are arguing that we should let the government give popular faiths special treatment and force people of different faiths to just suck it up and deal with it because you are the majority. That is just about the most unamerican stance you can take.

You advocate letting the majority religiously subjegate the minority. You mention art again NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT ART. Stop saying art. Do you have some problem where you cant use other words. This isnt about art, no one has ever been talking about art. You come into these discussions and try and replace the ten commandments with the word art. Its an obvious and petty ploy.

1- I have never asked that people not be allowe dto practice their religion freely. Time to prove your bullshit, show me where I said that or apologize.

2- **I** am talking about art and **YOU** are telling me what is and isn't art.

3- This isn't fox news why are you calling me unamerican?

{B]You want to force me to have to be exposed to your religious views in governmental places. You are forcing your views on me. If I walk into your church, fine. But when I walk into a public building you have no right to force your views on me.

Now you are lying about me being a liar, how clever of you.

Force you to be exposed? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lol! Seeing something is a violation of your rights, that's rich!

This last section of yours is priceless. First off I will repeat the very simple fact that as long as no one, including your imagined anti-theist is getting to put up thier symbols, it is indeed equal.

Imagined anti-theists? Look smart ass there are many on this board that openly admit that that is exactly what they are. Pay more attention.

Also it is playing favorites, one group gets what they want and all others don't. Get it?

Lets take this lovely logic of yours and apply it elsewhere. Women advocate for equal wages. "If one group get there way and no one else does it is favoritism." So if women get thier way and get equal wages, you are arguing that the government is favoring women... even though the end result is that everyone is equal?

You lose again.

Women - want equal wages to men
Men - have high wages
Companies - want no one to have any wages

Goverment says the only fair way to do it for women and men is giving no one any wages!

That is siding with the companies right? Yup.